Installing Control-M Agent on server with intermittent netwo

Everything about Control-M agents installation or setup.
Post Reply
masosm

Installing Control-M Agent on server with intermittent netwo

Post by masosm » 19 Aug 2008 9:32

hi

i am new at control-m and have a question if anyone can help!!
What is the effect of installing a Control-M Agent on a server that has intermittent network problems? Can Control-M server be able to keep up with jobs that are being run on a server that constantly drops the network connection? Will it be able to update the jobs progress status

User avatar
Dilbert
Nouveau
Nouveau
Posts: 185
Joined: 10 Jan 2007 12:00
Location: Zagreb, Croatia

Post by Dilbert » 19 Aug 2008 10:49

You shouldn't have problem with that, when job's ordered, Agent on that machine will execute jobs. But keep in mind that in case of network problems, Control-M Server can't able to determine job status in real time, but when you establish connection again, Agent will send job status to Control-M Server, so you will have delay in this case.

If you can, implement node group functionality.

masosm

Post by masosm » 21 Aug 2008 10:19

hi

thanx for the info. but The network disconnects about 10 times per day on average. Each disconnect can last about 3 to four minutes. Furthermore, the link is very slow. If you hit newline, it takes about 20 seconds to get back to a prompt.

User avatar
mauriziog
Nouveau
Nouveau
Posts: 807
Joined: 08 Jun 2007 12:00
Location: Varese - Italy
Contact:

Post by mauriziog » 10 Sep 2008 2:03

Code: Select all

The network disconnects about 10 times per day on average. Each disconnect can last about 3 to four minutes. Furthermore, the link is very slow. 
The network is very important in the open architecture, so I suggest you to have a better network, more stable. If always the agent become unreacheable many times a day, better is first do something for the network.

If the agent is so instable, the scheduling flow time became variable not for the complexity of elaborations but for the network: very BAD.

Post Reply